COMPARED

Four honest answers.

Every one of these is a real question a buyer asks before a first call, and each page answers it the way we would on the call — including the part where the alternative is the better tool.

How these pages are written

No competitor is named. The alternatives are described by their shape — a general chat assistant, rules-and-triggers automation, a new hire, the way you do it now — because the argument is about categories of tool, and naming a brand would only make it about something else.

Every page concedes. Each one carries a section on where the alternative wins, and it is not a token: there are cases in all four where the honest recommendation is to keep what you have. A comparison that cannot name one is an advertisement.

No new numbers. The only figures on these pages are the ones the rest of this site already stands behind — the price per AI employee on shift, the median time to a first employee, the cover, the trial. No hours saved, no error rates, no customer logos.

What is true in all four

An AI employee is a named role on shift, not a script. It owns an outcome, asks when it is unsure, and reports what it did. Whichever alternative you are weighing it against, the same four things come with it:

  • Credentials scoped per system — read, write or send, granted by you, revocable immediately.
  • A working memory of your business, from your documents and connected systems, with no onboarding period.
  • Approval checkpoints you name, so a person decides anything with a consequence before it happens.
  • A log of every action with its inputs, sources, reasoning trail and output — replayable, and exportable to your SIEM.

Still deciding

Read what each role actually handles on a shift, check the price per employee, or tell us the process that eats your team’s week and we will tell you which of these four you are really choosing between.